eGovernance in India

Improving eGovernance in INDIA

Archive for the ‘NISG’ Category

National Institute of Smart Governance,
NISG,
J. Sathyanarayana,
MOA NISG,

NIC nexus with C1 INDIA, PWC, -Is there TRANSPARENCY in NIC activities ?

Posted by egovindia on May 4, 2008

NIC nexus with C1 INDIA, PWC,

LOOK at this what NIC has done !!!!!

NIC nexus with C1 INDIA, PWC,

1. In the prequalification criteria Page no.2, item no 2 (VI) NIC said that �the vendor or the prime bidder in the case of consortium should be CMM level 4 or ISO 9000-3 certified�.  (Please note that there is no certification called ISO 9000-3 in this world and it is only the guidelines for software companies.  Through this ITI which has deployed more than 20 eProcurement projects across the country has been prevented from participating in the tender) .
2. Apparently ITI Limited a PSU under MCIT has made a representation to NIC stating that the prequalification criteria is wrong and ITI should be allowed to participate in the tender which has been refused by NIC orally.

3. Further STQC experts also informed that the prequalification criteria is wrong.

4. Without listening to the STQC and ITI, NIC went ahead and executed the tender for eProcurement.

5. Interestingly (??) the consortium of PWC and C1 INDIA bagged the order form NIC.

6. How beautiful and professional this entire transaction is:

– The PWC who is the consultant to GOAP is the Prime bidder of Consortium.

- The C1 INDIA which bagged the project from GOAP through the recommendations of PWC is the consortium partner.

- Though the pre-qulaification criteria was wrong and ITI as well as STQC have submitted the note to this effect, NIC went ahead and awarded the tender to PWC & C1 consortium.


- Now the NIC along with PWC and C1 INDIA can go to any state/central/ PSU and deploy eProcurement project to enhance transparency (??). however there is no transparency in the NIC’s Procement itself?
Now questions to NIC are:

Can NIC Put a wrong Qualification criteria to prevent their own sister concern ITI Limited and do not respond to the representation made by ITI Limited?

Can a consultant (PWC) become the supplier (PWC & C1 consortium)?

When a consultant (PWC) recommends some company (C1 ) for the award (in GOAP), can the consultant (PWC) join with the same company (PWC) for another project (NIC) as supplier.

Interstingly PWC (Consultant of GOAP project) is also a deployment partner of the C1 (Visit http:// www.c1india. com/partners/ partners. html#)

5. How to put an end to such nonsenses ?

6. Whether NIC is obligated to reply ITI letter or not? NIC can neglet the letter of ITI just like that?

Is the legal battle is only the remedy?

Is there any authority who can parade these officials on open road puting a necklace of “corrupt officer”?
____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ ____

Posted in NIC, NISG, eGovernance Intiatives of Govt., eGovernance issues | Leave a Comment »

Mr. R. Chandrashekar’s Pre-planned idea of starting NISG along with Mr. J. Sathyanarayana

Posted by egovindia on July 15, 2006

Posted in NISG | Leave a Comment »

eGovernance in INDIA through NISG is PRE-PLANNED idea of Mr. R. Chandrashekar

Posted by egovindia on July 15, 2006

Posted in NISG | Leave a Comment »

Why NISG did not look into this project in Tamilnadu to REPLICATE in other States ?

Posted by egovindia on July 15, 2006

Posted in NISG | Leave a Comment »

NISG’S MOCKERY of eGovernance in INDIA :: Time to wind up NISG save eGovernance in INDIA from NONACCOUNTABILITY

Posted by egovindia on July 13, 2006

Publication in Dataquest on e-gov corruption – The E-governance Muddle

WHO provided the information to Srivatsa Krishna, IAS is currently with the World Bank in Washington, DC. ?

Reply from DIT on NISG and CEO of NISG – These are important questions which the nation needs an answer.

Mr Umashankar’s reply to Srivatsa Krishna // http://www.dqindia.com/content/spotlight/2005/105111001.asp

[eGovINDIA] Mail to Mr.J.Sathyanarayana, CEO, NISG seeking his views on certain allegations

Re: [eGovINDIA] NISG had done it again. C1 gets the e-biz tender from NISG. God Save India

Responsible Transparent Integrity Accountable

NOTACCOUNTABLE INSTITUTION of Smart Governance “NISG”

Need is to stop the loot in the name of BOOT… NISG promoting this through C 1 INDIA

NISG is a SCHEME and also a SCAM: No Reply-NOT Responsible-NOT Transparent

PARLIAMENT OF INDIA – RAJYA SABHA – DEPARTMENT-RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES, LAW AND JUSTICE

National Institute For Smart Government -NISG – Why 9 Crores ?

Re: [eGovINDIA] NISG & Microsoft MoU – Read between the lines.

Unbelievable Act of World Bank

http://egovindia.wordpress.com/2006/07/04/unbelievable-act-of-world-bank/

World Bank need to INVESTIGATE before PATRONIZING / GLAMOURIZING Andhra Pradesh eProcurment SCAM.

http://nasscomundp.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/world-bank-need-to-investigate-before-patronizing-glamourizing-andhra-pradesh-eprocurment-scam/

World Bank and UNDP to know how eprocurement in AP facilitates cartel formation

http://nasscomundp.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/world-bank-and-undp-to-know-how-eprocurement-in-ap-facilitates-cartel-formation/

World Bank and UNDP please read letter from Tendercity to Sri. Narsing Rao , Secretary, ITC&C Dept. Andhra Pradesh State on eProcurement scam worth Rs. 38,000 Crores in Andhra Pradesh State in INDIA.

http://nasscomundp.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/world-bank-and-undp-please-read-letter-from-tendercity-to-sri-narsing-rao-secretary-itcc-dept-andhra-pradesh-state-on-eprocurement-scam-worth-rs-38000-crores-in-andhra-pradesh-state-in-india/

Reply of Sri. Narsing Rao , Secretary, ITC&C Dept. Andhra Pradesh State to eProcurement- Representation of Sri. Ramesh Sinha, CEO, Appllitech Tendercity. com India Pvt. Ltd.- Apprehensions on security in eProcurement platform – Reply- Reg. Mr. Rao writes: You are absolutely right on this one. We gave totally misleading figures. The correct figures are: 9841 tenders worth Rs. 32,578 crores have been processed with security loop holes.

http://nasscomundp.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/reply-of-sri-narsing-rao-secretary-itcc-dept-andhra-pradesh-state-to-eprocurement-representation-of-sri-ramesh-sinha-ceo-appllitech-tendercity-com-india-pvt-ltd-apprehensions-on-security-in-eprocureme/

AP State eProcuremnet scam – why my integrity,credibility, capability is being questioned

http://nasscomundp.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/ap-state-eprocuremnet-scam-why-my-integritycredibility-capability-is-being-questioned/

AMPLIFYING LOCAL VOICES TO DEMOCRATIZE DEVELOPMENT , says Bank Information Center “BIC”

http://nasscomundp.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/amplifying-local-voices-to-democratize-development-says-bank-information-center-bic/

What WORLD BANK and UNDP need to know about eProcurement promoted by NISG, AP State. eGovINDIA member files Complaint against Mr. Rajiv Chawla IAS., and others in connection with criminal breach of trust and corruption in the processing of centralised e-procurement tender – regarding. Before the Hon’ble Lokayukta of Karnataka

http://nasscomundp.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/what-world-bank-and-undp-need-to-know-about-eprocurement-promoted-by-nisg-ap-state/

UNDP, NASSCOM, WORLD BANK need to know what is happenning in eGovernance in INDIA with the help of NISG

http://nasscomundp.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/undp-nasscom-world-bank-need-to-know-what-is-happenning-in-egovernance-in-india-with-the-help-of-nisg/

Want to know more. Write to me.

Thanks

Sincerely

V. M. Kumaraswamy, MBA

This is Mr. V. M. Kumaraswamy, MBA.

About eGovINDIA and it’s activties

http://egovindia.wordpress.com/

http://nisg.wordpress.com/

http://right2information.wordpress.com/

http://nasscomundp.wordpress.com/

http://whistleblowers.wordpress.com/

http://customsmuddle.wordpress.com/

http://coverup2bungled.wordpress.com

Posted in NISG | 5 Comments »

[eGovINDIA] Mail to Mr.J.Sathyanarayana, CEO, NISG seeking his views on certain allegations

Posted by egovindia on July 13, 2006

 [eGovINDIA] Mail to Mr.J.Sathyanarayana, CEO, NISG seeking his views on certain allegations

27-4-05

Dear Members,

I have received the following expose on Mr.J.
Satyanarayana IAS., who heads the NISG now. 

One of the affected persons met me four weeks ago. He
is from a reputed area. Now I have another reputed
source confirming the corrupt ways of Mr.J.
Satyanarayana. 

Coupled with the B1 and e-biz episodes I have every
reason to consider the information prima facie true.
But the law dictum says "hear the other side also".
And so I had  written to  Mr.J. Satyanarayana and a
copy is marked here for your information.
I hope Mr.Satyanarayana responds to this mail. 

27-4-05

My dear esteemed colleague Mr.J. Satyanarayana,
You are heading an organisation (National Institute of
Smart Government) which had been declared the single
nodal agency to route all e-gov proposals of the
country. The information we have received on you does
not portray you an honest person. Your dealings with
regard to B1 and e-biz do not impress true e-gov
enthusiasts like me. For your information, a top
executive of C1 India met me during the national e-gov
conference during Feb this year at Bhubaneswar and
offered me to a proposal whereby I should submit e-gov
proposals and he would get it approved and
implemented. He was talking as though he had the
entire e-gov decision makers in his pockets. May be he
is correct.
Now the very same corrupt C1 had bagged the e-biz
contract through NISG, that is you.
NISG does not have anyone who has any e-gov experience
except you. So any decision from NISG means a decision
by you only, even if you try to defend the other way.
As a District Collector, I owned all the decisions on
e-gov at Tiruvarur (1999-2001) because there was no
one who could understand e-gov in Tiruvarur at that
time. You have a team which matches my Tiruvarur
bureaucracy of 1999. 

Mr. Satyanarayana, you owe an explanation to the
nation on these allegations. Because you are the
single most important person who can make or mar
e-governance in India. This is an unfortunate
situation whereby the country had handed over the
entire e-gov work to a single individual. We expect
you to uphold the best values of the IAS coupled with
honesty, transparency and integrity. In this case your
honesty and integrity had come under a cloud. We would
like to hear your side. I am sending this write up on
behalf of all Indians living in India and abroad who
wish to see India a truly e-governed nation. 

And kindly do reply so that we get the benefit of
hearing your side. In case we do not hear from you
within a reasonable time, say 7 days, it would be
presumed that you had accepted all the allegations
mentioned in the write up attached below. 

From  my experience I can share with you that when I
served as  District Collector at Tiruvarur an
anonymous allegation petition was received against me.
Within the same day I sat and prepared a reply and
sent it to the Government though it was not expected
on my part to reply to an anonymous petition.
When you take strong action against criminals this
happens. If one is too corrupt then also such
petitions arise. In the case of Tiruvarur mostly the
high class criminals who owned a house worth Rs.10
lakhs and above were booked under goondas act, illicit
arrack distillation as well as sale was wiped out in
the district with the help of the police and women
Self Help Groups (SHGs),   the women SHGs were
empowered to recommend arrest of anti social elements
and the anti social elements were paraded through the
town centre with placards hanging under their neck.
And so the allegation petition arose. I submitted my
reply to the Government on the same day. 

This is the typical reaction of an honest officer. 

I am attaching the allegation write up which I had
received from a highly reliable source. I request your
feedback/comments: 

"PwC & J. Satyanarayana – A sinister connection??

Mr.JS as Secretary (IT)- Government of Andhra Pradesh 

One needs to look closely at the consultancy projects
awarded by J Satyanarayana and you will see a pattern
emerge The only company to win most of the contracts
was PwC.

Mr. Satyanarayana was the Principal Secretary of
Information Technology in Government of Andhra Pradesh
for 4 years from 2000, has awarded consultancy jobs to
PwC for 5 major Projects namely, OLTP, SBMS (Social
Welfare), IFIS (Finance department), E Procurement and
HRMS. PwC’s job was to prepare the RFP, call for
tenders on behalf of Govt. of Andhra Pradesh evaluate
the technical bids, qualify final bidders for
commercial bid opening and finally recommending and
leave the decision to the government to place orders
on such party. It may also be interesting to note that
in some evaluations, it was just left to PwC to sit
through product demonstrations without any
participation of the Government.

PwC also was assigned a consultancy job from GOAP to
study each department and come out with a need
analysis and an architecture/roadmap for each
department. There was no process reengineering.  The
Output was the “Big picture” This architecture was
completely faulty and was never used by any
department. The OLTP Project was a disaster, however
2.10 crores was spent for the pilot other that the
project consultancy fees to PwC

Mr. Satyanarayana has also recommended PwC’s name to
the Commercial taxes department and the Department of
Municipal administration of the Government of Andhra
Pradesh as a consultant.

This was the time where Mr, Satyanarayana was
transferred from the IT department to the Social
Welfare department. Along with him PwC’s contract was
also not extended further. All the above transactions
looked normal

Mr.JS, as CEO - NISG.
The first project taken by NISG was EBIZ. As usual
NISG wanted to appoint a consultant and architected a
tender to enable the selection of PwC as a consultant.
NISG has called for a closed tender and the tender
documents were given to 1. Crimson Logic  (Singapore
based firm). 2. Haselfre (a 4 month old company who
would not qualify the criteria) 3. PwC. Haselfre was
disqualified in the prebid evaluation criteria while
Crimson logic was disqualified on the technical
grounds and the contract for consultancy for EBIZ
(Ministry of Commerce initiative) was issued to PwC.
PwC was given a task for creating a pilot for Ebiz as
an additional job. Pilot was based on multiple
technologies where integration would become a major
issue. Subsequently NISG has called for an RFP and
currently the technical bids are under scrutiny. Not
surprisingly, NISG has awarded the contract to PwC for
evaluating the Ebiz bids.

There are several consulting companies like KPMG, TCS,
Wipro, Satyam, Ernst & Young , Microsoft Consulting
services etc. who can manage similar jobs and it is
difficult to understand the reason NISG has floated
limited enquiries to only Crimson logic, Haselfre and
PwC.

NISG has awarded the e-govworld the Knowledge portal
(Ministry of Information Technology – Government of
India), Govt of Chattisgarh / Govt of Karnataka
procurement RFP preparation consulting job to PwC. It
is very evident that all these will lead to certain
vendors winning these tenders.

It is very evident that J. Satyanatanaraya has an
unholy nexus with Pwc and it warrants a closer look at
the possibility of corruption in the process.

To add, NISG has a bunch of inexperienced youngsters
who do not understand the working of the Government
involved in creation of e-governance projects. This
will ensure that all projects taken up by them will
fail. Precious resources of the Government are being
wasted by NISG by the CEO flying in business class in
India and Abroad to attend seminars, which will add no
value to the successful implementation of e-governance
projects".

Hoping to hear from you soon. 

Regards.

Umashankar
 Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
"Umashankar C" <umashankarc@yahoo.com>
C.Umashankar IAS., (TamilNadu Cadre)
e-governance expert and Member (Special Invitee) - Working group for
implementation of National e-governance action plan, Government of India,
New Delhi. 

Moderator:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eGovINDIA
http://sugame.com/umashankar

Chennai:
Ph: 91-44-52054443

Posted in NISG | Leave a Comment »

Re: [eGovINDIA] NISG had done it again. C1 gets the e-biz tender from NISG. God Save India

Posted by egovindia on July 9, 2006

Re: [eGovINDIA] NISG had done it again. C1 gets the e-biz tender from NISG. God Save India

 

 

Umashankar C <umashankarc@yahoo.com> wrote:

26-4-05

Dear Members,

 


With profound sorrow I wish to bring to your notice
that NISG had finalised the tender for the E-biz
initiative in favour of C1 India.

 


The reason for my concern is as follows:

 


The CEO of C1 India met me in Bhubaneswar during the
8th National E-gov conference (Feb, 2005) and proposed
me that I should submit some e-gov proposals and he
would get the same cleared for national level
implementation.

 


The way in which he spoke gave the indication as
though he had every one in his pocket.
Apparently he has Mr.Sathyanarayana of NISG in his
pockets.


And so C1 India which was hitherto unknown to Indians
became a great e-gov service provider for
e-procurement. The pricing methodology adopted was to
offer a percentage of the tender sum to the service
provider! This is nothing but a huge fraud. Now the
e-biz tender has gone in favour of C1. They would have
finalised an other path breaking revenue model, even
beating the e-procurement model!

I got information yesterday that both Ram Infotech and
C1 India worked with Mr.Sathyanarayana when he served
as IT Secretary in AP.

So any tender would be finalised only in favour of his
known companies whether they are capable or not is
immaterial.

A huge scale corruption is being perpetrated by my
colleague Mr.Sathyanarayana which has to be stopped.

It is a wonder that NISG which Mr.Sathyanarayana has
been heading with no known e-gov specialist on board
has been finalising thousands of crores of rupees
worth e-gov projects. And NISG is a private company.

 


How a private company is allowed to have this corrupt
run?

 


I have a feeling that the higher ups in the Government
of India, I mean my colleagues in the IT ministry have
a role to play in this!

I am a member of the national level committee for
implementation of national e-gov action plan. But I
have not got any invitation to attend meeting so far.
NISG has been busy selling the country in the
meanwhile.

God save India!

Umashankar

C.Umashankar IAS., (TamilNadu Cadre)
e-governance expert and Member (Special Invitee) – Working group for implementation of National e-governance action plan, Government of India, New Delhi.

Moderator:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eGovINDIA
http://sugame.com/umashankar

Chennai:
Ph: 91-44-52054443
_______________________________________________________________

 

Dear Mr. Umashankar,

Either you do curruption or you knowingly bear curruption, you are currupted, “SO AS WE ALL ARE CURRUPTED”.

I believe no one will bother with these lines and will not even realize how helpless or rather say how Coward we have graduted towards.

In my earlier postings i have tried to mention the security lapses maintained intentionally in e-Procurement in A.P. to play around with Rs. 15000 crore or more on mercy of NISG or C1.

I had tried to APPEAL to all the concerned that e-Governance may be taken off by bringing transparency on its root level ie; it should be made mandatory that all the Tendering Procedures should be made Public at each and every stage and hence we may think of Realizing Optimum Value of Public Money realized in Bringing Growth to them and hence to the Nation.

I again doubt on many bogus members of our group who intentionally deviate the seriousness of group and make some serious group members to be kept aloof.

I Invite Attention of everybodies inner MORAL (if still Live) to come Forward and take up NISG and C1, and few others like them to the Public Court, having a belief if all the Four Pillars of Democracy including media is not got Paralyzed completely. My inner belief is that it has not got completely so, let us strengthen the Pillars and take initiative.

I propose to file a PIL on these Curruption issues specific to the e-Governance initiative to first eradicate such misappropriation of Public Fund and further try to get some strict Law and Constitution to put all Culprints who play around with e-Governance to undergo a sentence of “DESHDROH” and be penalized substancially, These hearing again should be tackeled in ‘Fast Courts”.

Mr. Umashankar, i`m sorry that you are not liking the pocket of CEO of C1, it could have Heavenly Comfort and strong Financial Security, so you should not wait for invitation from NEGAP, rather you may receive expulsion or cancellation of your status. To rectify that you may think of searching a right place in his pocket (I`m sure many will be in Line, even from this group to have some space in his Pocket, My GoddWishes are with them.

Let us form an specific Action Committe within us to battle with these lines of open Curruption in space of e-Governance. I propose to search only one Dead Honest Judicial Person to head this committe and let us colloborate for Good e-Governance unlike of NISG. why am i proposing Dead Honest because the chosen one should not start searching godd place in his pocket.

I`m confident “We Shall Overcome………”

All the concerned Members, With a request to search if your Inner is there?
Dr. Manoj Verma

 Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:35:15 +0100 (BST)

 

“manoj verma” drmkv@yahoo.co.in
_________________________________________________

 [eGovINDIA] Regarding C1

 Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:12:08 -0700 (PDT)

“Ravi” <ravindran_vc@yahoo.com>

Dear Members,

C1 is a company using all the means it can to get business, many a
number of government officials even in top levels are involved and in
support of such companies for one or other ethical and unethical reasons. I
am sure each and every action is justifiable as long as the justice as
such is not getting tampered with.

E Governance if justfully enabled will be a boon to country such as
ours due to its obvious benefits. The pathetic aspect is the companies
such as C1 and those supporting such companies are willingly acting
against the future of the nation.

They should be treated as anti nationals as such.

If I am correct then the company C1 is just a dealer for Commerce One a
Bankrupt US based company whose IPR was auctioned and sold off to some
German based firm.

How can C1 be ever trusted with such critical initiatives such as E
Governance??

I just wish make a comment here that “Those who have the power to
correct the wrong and simply not taking the correct measures are only
allowing the wrong get more and more deep routed”

Thanking You for reading this message
With Warm Regards

Ravindran.V.C.

E Procurement Consultant 

________________________________________________

 

 Dear Mr. Umashankar,

An oblique comment (does not address the central,
serious issue of cooked up tendering process but
something to be aware of in the globalized world):

Googled for “C1 India” and followed some links. Looks
like C1 India is not part of the US company whose technology
it might be using.

It is simply a distributor, not a subsidiary, of
Commerce One US. The point being, US companies and
their executives can be prosecuted under US laws for
bribing overseas. Therefore, if furnished the evidence
of such bribing in India, one could even go to the
district attorney in Santa Clara county where Commerce
One is based. If there is an involvement of Commerce
One officers/employees in bribing, I am here to take
the case to the public prosecutor. A long shot. But
worth pursuing as one of the prongs in the strategy.

The DA offices have a lot of discretion whether to
pursue or not, but it is only DAs in the US that
are expected to be activist and do go after the
likes of Enrons and Worldcom.

Regards,
Sanjay.

 Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:47:29 -0000

“sndani” sndani@yahoo.com 

___________________________________________________________

 

 Dear Mr. Sanjay,

If you research, you will find that Commerce One, US has got Bankurpt and afterwards one German Firm had taken it over, C1 India earlier was a distributor of Commerce One US and had cheated a lot companies with their that association, M/S Antares System had lodged the FIRST REPORTED CYBER CRIME against C1 India aginst infringment of IPR of Antares System, Bangalore in 2003 which is still under trial in High Court Delhi.

I doubt C1 India will have any relation now with sold out Commerce One currently. But NISG could be taken in account as you suggested being a organization promoted by UNDP fund and that will help India a lot to ALARM other J. Satyanarayan in making in India to sabotage the right e-Governance initiative.

Dr. Manoj Verma

 Wed, 27 Apr 2005 06:42:00 +0100 (BST)

“manoj verma” drmkv@yahoo.co.in

________________________________________________________________

 

 eGov INDIA <egovindia@yahoo.com> wrote:

Dear S DANI,

I do not think it is affiliated with any US company. Here is some information about the company.

http://www.c1india.com/

“This initiative is a part of the state government’s efforts to increase efficiencies in all its departments through faster and more transparent automated procurement procedures.

In C1 India we have found a committed partner whose support and dedication to this project is commendable.”
- Principal Secretary (IT&C),
Government of Andhra Pradesh

“The Andhra Pradesh government has saved a whopping Rs 616.27 crore in 2003-04 because of its use of the e-procurement platform.

In fact, so successful has been the e-procurement practice that the total amount spent by the government on 1,212 projects amounting to an estimated Rs 2,801 crore is 22 per cent lower than its own estimations.”Publication: Business Standard
Hyderabad May 07,2004

INDIA Headquarters:
D-5 Defence Colony, New Delhi – 110024 India
Tel: +91-11-2465-5185, Fax: +91-11-2465-5186 Mumbai:
1st Floor, Mehta House, Apollo Street Fort,
Mumbai – 400 023
Tel: +91-22-22621651, 22621667/68/69
Fax: +91-22650055 Kolkata:
70 A, Block D, UCO Bank Building,New Alipure, Kolkata – 700 053
Tel: +91-33-24783378 Banglore:
211, Ranka Court, 2nd Block, 18 Cambridge Layout, Ulsoor
Banglore- 560-008
Tel: +91-80-5561066 Mobile: 9844111607 Hyderabad:
6-2-1012, 1st Floor, Above ICICIBank, TGV Mansion, Khairathabad, Hyderabad-500 004
Tel: +91-40-55823580-81
Fax: +91-40 – 55363580INTERNATIONAL Middle-East Office:
520, OUD MEHTA, P.O. Box:25922, U.A.E.
Tel: +97143243626, Fax: +97143243545
General Enquiries
If your enquiry lies outside the purview of what is mentioned above, mail us at info@c1india.com.

AP saves Rs 616cr via e-procurement

DGS&D goes live with e-tender

Thanks

Kumaraswamy V. M.

______________________________________________

 

 Dear Mr. Sanjay,

Again dodging to the public, i have earlier informed that what Indian IT Act Recommends and why till 1st March 2005, it was not followed, it could cause a serious Security violation in helping the Vested Interest people, either System Administrator(C1 India), A.P. Govt. Officials, any particular Vendor or nexus of either or all mentioned.

It is again doubt ful why for Two Years an Indian IT Act was openly been violated.

I have posted few more postings on this issue recently you may view those to have Crystal Clear Picture on the same, So as it has got repeated with the Tender invited by NIC for e-Procurement, again NISG short of an Unlawful, non-transparent favor had extended to C1 India by NIC Officials.

I`m repeatedly asking CVC, NIC, NISG, APTS, Andhra Pradesh IT Deptt., DGS&D to publish the Tendering procedures adopted for selecting C1 India, but no one is responding confirms the smoke more thicker.

This is to update you.

Dr. Manoj Verma

________________________________________________

Posted in NISG | Leave a Comment »

Responsible Transparent Integrity Accountable

Posted by egovindia on July 7, 2006

Posted in NISG | Leave a Comment »

NOTACCOUNTABLE INSTITUTION of Smart Governance “NISG”

Posted by egovindia on July 7, 2006

What NOTACCOUNTABLE INSTITUTION of Smart Governance “NISG” can do in eGovernance of INDIA ?
Governance be Accountable Transparent

http://nisg.wordpress.com

NKC says: “Reengineer govt processes bef  
“MCA 21″ is a mockery of e-governance. N  
INDIA has INVESTED in NIC since 1976 – W  
BangaloreOne yet to deliver on promises  
eGovernance Jt. Secretary Mr. R. Chandra  
COUNTER POINT to eGovMUDDLE by World Ban  
Sameer Sachdev about NISG before he was  
Is NISG a SCAM ? an IAS Officer Letter t  
Reply by IAS Officer Mr. Umashankar to M  
Mr. R. Chandrashekar Jt. Secretary eGove  
What may be reason WHY NISG was formed?  
National institute of SMART Government “  
UNDP & NISG facts and timeline /WHY  
NISG & Microsoft MoU – Read between  
EQUITY PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL INS  
We also need to highlight the wrong move  
NKC panel unveils blueprint for e-govern  
What workshops CEO of NISG talking about  
Current CEO of NISG selected eSeva and B  
How a private company NISG can corner fu  
About CARD pet project of CEO of NISG, R  
NISG’s LARGEST INVESTOR is UNDP not NASS  
Just doing what current NISG does !! Not  
Creation of National Institute of Smart  
SMART is acronym for Simple, Moral, Acco

Is UNDP INDIA giving wrong information to UNDP…

How can Government of INDIA mislead UDNP to make…

How can UNDP close it’s EYES and think NISG is G…

What a JOKE NISG training officers to…

How can Government of INDIA mislead UDNP to make INVESTMENT in NISG when NISG was not approved by CABINET of INDIA.

Posted in NISG | Leave a Comment »

Need is to stop the loot in the name of BOOT… NISG promoting this through C 1 INDIA

Posted by egovindia on July 6, 2006

 e-Procurement is a Jackpot for C 1 INDIA .com & IAS officer concerned 7.64 crore revenue in the first year.. 

Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:41:51 -0800 (PST)
From:  “Avinash Chaurasia” <chaurasia_avinash@yahoo.com

Subject: Re: e-Procurement is a Jackpot for c1.com & IASofficer concerned 7.64 crore revenue in the first year.. 
To: “Venkatappa Kumaraswamy” <vmkumaraswamy@yahoo.com>

Poser was
How did govt. pay for these services of e-procurement
?
0.24% Plus 4500 each tender was paid…
Which means
1212 X4500          =  5454000/-
0.24% 0f 2801 crore = 67224000/-
Total paid to C1Com = 7,26,78,000/-

Rs 7.26 Crore payment paid in the first year…
How many more years the payment will keep on getting
paid ?
How many stupid IAS officers will keep on paying this
in other state on “Me TOO” Hyderabad replication…
Why should they be paying…

Were you pre selected for this ???

This has not been answered…
How IT department pre-selected C 1 INDIA Com for this …
What was their credential…
Have they done similar things before…
Did anyone quote lower than 0.24 %…

NIC makes website for Govt for as little as Rs 9000/-
containing 25 pages….
Why should the Government be paying so much money…
what is unque about the application is not clear…
The Tender process involves making of estimates…
Which are done by different people on different desks
in different offices… by refering to different
documents… All of this then moves thru’ approval
process which in turn gives decision about the tendr
process…
Tender is put on  the web & the suppliers have to
bid…
When bids are received the evaluation also involves
movement of files from desk to desk…
It follows a workflow…
How does this happen on this web based application…
It is mere buying & selling of web based tenders that
is happening…
How the savings had accrued no one can
substantiate….
By creating hype yes the company had made money under
the GARB of joint venture with Information technology
department of Andhra Pradesh…
Thre used to be formal joint venture with Govt putting
up equity & having a say in the management…

Now these informal joint ventures are being created by
IAS cocerned to siphon off mpney for themselves and
promote companies of their choice & score marks on
e-GOvernance project contests…

Is there any uniqueness in e-procurement program ?
Uniqueness of the software is not substantiated & can
not be substantiated…
Newspaper will publish anything….. without due
application of mind and cross checking the facts…
That is really unfortunate

Posted in NISG | Leave a Comment »