eGovernance in India

Improving eGovernance in INDIA

eProcurment Scandle in GoK:Rajeev Chawla’s Misdeeds in recent eProcurement Tender to HP.

Posted by egovindia on January 18, 2007

eProcurment Scandle in GoK: Rajeev Chawla’s Misdeeds in recent eProcurement Tender to HP.

Rajeev Chawla Misdeeds in recent eProcrurement Tender he has alloted to H.P., is a SCAMand  is three time higher then Other players.

This is a big SCAM done by Rajeev Chawla in eGovernance of GOK.

We all need to do something.

—————–
Forwarded Message:

Subj: What eGovernance Secretary Rajeev Chawla is advising and doing in GOK amounts to Deception and Cheating. 
Date: 3/13/2006 6:16:18 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time
From: vmkumaraswamy@yahoo.com
To: cs@karnataka.gov.in, acs@karnataka.gov.in, prs-plan@karnataka.gov.in, prs-home@karnataka.gov.in , devcom@karnataka.gov.in , prs-pwd@karnataka.gov.in, prsar-dpar@karnataka.gov.in , secyegov-dpar@karnataka.gov.in , prs-dpar@karnataka.gov.in , secyegov@karnataka.gov.in, itmin@vsb.kar.nic.in, , \nitsec@bangaloreit.com
CC: \n\nrajabhujanga@yahoo.com, \nvmkumaraswamy@yahoo.com\n, egovgok@yahoogroups.com\n, \negovindia@yahoogroups.com, \nellakavi@yahoogroups.com\n, cm@kar.nic.in, \n\ncm@karnataka.gov.in, “,1] ); //–>itmin@bangaloreit.com , itsec@bangaloreit.com
CC: rajabhujanga@yahoo.com, vmkumaraswamy@yahoo.com , egovgok@yahoogroups.com , egovindia@yahoogroups.com, ellakavi@yahoogroups.com , cm@kar.nic.in, cm@karnataka.gov.in, , \nscm_svr@secretariat1.kar.nic.in\n, osdtocm@vsb.kar.nic.in\n, \nnovamed@aol.com
Sent from the Internet (Details)
E KAVI, E Gov India, India RTI,\n
Judicial Reforms &
India Whistle Blower's Action Group\n
\nFacilitating Emergence of  New India:
\nBased on Values of Transparency & Accountability, E Governance, Natural Justice, Human Rights and Human Dignity  \n
 “,1] ); //–> cmcc@secretariat1.kar.nic.in , scm_svr@secretariat1.kar.nic.in , osdtocm@vsb.kar.nic.in , novamed@aol.com Sent from the Internet (Details)

E KAVI, E Gov India, India RTI,
Judicial Reforms &
India Whistle Blower’s Action Group

Facilitating Emergence of  New India:

Based on Values of Transparency & Accountability, E Governance, Natural Justice, Human Rights and Human Dignity 

 

        \u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\u003d\n

March 14th 2006

Hello CS and other Secretaries of GOK,

You\nall need to look into the activities of eGovernance Secretary Mr.\nRajeev Chawla. He is leading GOK to Cheat and Deceive people of Karnataka and all others in GOK.

GOK need to watch what is happenning in eGovernance in GOK !!\n

Even countries like Singapore does not mention what platform to use. \n\nSingapore specifies in every tender "the applicaition software should be compatible for cross platform deployment". Why not \nKarnataka State and INDIA\n ?

Even WORLD BANK suggests to use OPEN STANDARDS and OPEN SYSTEMS.

Even our own President advises all of us to use OPEN SOURCE and OPEN STANDARDS in all our systems.\n

Rajeev Chawla is favouring only ONE VENDOR for GOK. That is MICROSOFT.

Rajeev Chawla has made GOK to sign MOU with MICROSOFT for PROJECT SHIKSHA.

______________________________

\n_____________\n

Bangalore one is on Microsoft Platform.\nBangalore One TENDER Documents have been DOCTORED in such way that ONLY\nONE PERSON can bid on the TENDER which used MICROSOFT SOFTWARE.

There is a complained filed with LOKAYUKTHA on Bangalore One project.

There is PIL filed and admitted in High Court on Bangalore one project.\n

_______________________________________________________”,1] ); //–>

        ===============================================
March 14th 2006

Hello CS and other Secretaries of GOK,

You all need to look into the activities of eGovernance Secretary Mr. Rajeev Chawla. He is leading GOK to Cheat and Deceive people of Karnataka and all others in GOK.

GOK need to watch what is happenning in eGovernance in GOK !!

Even countries like Singapore does not mention what platform to use. Singapore specifies in every tender “the applicaition software should be compatible for cross platform deployment”. Why not Karnataka State and INDIA ?

Even WORLD BANK suggests to use OPEN STANDARDS and OPEN SYSTEMS.

Even our own President advises all of us to use OPEN SOURCE and OPEN STANDARDS in all our systems.

Rajeev Chawla is favouring only ONE VENDOR for GOK. That is MICROSOFT.

Rajeev Chawla has made GOK to sign MOU with MICROSOFT for PROJECT SHIKSHA.

______________________________ _____________

Bangalore one is on Microsoft Platform. Bangalore One TENDER Documents have been DOCTORED in such way that ONLY ONE PERSON can bid on the TENDER which used MICROSOFT SOFTWARE.

There is a complained filed with LOKAYUKTHA on Bangalore One project.

There is PIL filed and admitted in High Court on Bangalore one project.

_______________________________________________________Look at some of the implications of BHOOMI Project. This is going to haunt GOK in the future. Please look at the reports that have been sent to all of you. \n

Bhoomi: "E-Governance", Or An Anti-Politics Machine Necessary to Globalize B'lore
\n\n 
Bhoomi and the political economy of land\n
Peri-urban \nBangalore, Karnataka\n
 

Karnataka was formed in 1956 by merging the princely state of \nMysore with areas from other states and provinces: parts of Coorg, the princely state of \nHyderabad , and the Bombay and Madras Presidencies.\n  The\nlink for 'land coalition' in Footnote 127, discusses the five\ngovernance regimes, various aspects of land management, and the\nfunctions of the Revenue department.  Under the five governance regimes, land management systems recorded up to 1500 forms of tenures. \n

 
BHOOMI – Some Critical Observations:
“,1] ); //–>

Look at some of the implications of BHOOMI Project. This is going to haunt GOK in the future. Please look at the reports that have been sent to all of you.

Bhoomi: “E-Governance”, Or An Anti-Politics Machine Necessary to Globalize B’lore

 

Bhoomi and the political economy of land

Peri-urban Bangalore, Karnataka

 

Karnataka was formed in 1956 by merging the princely state of Mysore with areas from other states and provinces: parts of Coorg, the princely state of Hyderabad , and the Bombay and Madras Presidencies.   The link for ‘land coalition’ in Footnote 127, discusses the five governance regimes, various aspects of land management, and the functions of the Revenue department.  Under the five governance regimes, land management systems recorded up to 1500 forms of tenures. 

 

BHOOMI – Some Critical Observations:
VA and, as one small farmer put it, the work could be 'fast and efficient', at least in an \n emergency.

After Bhoomi, all categories of landowners said that any significant change like a mutation takes 3-4 months.  This delay may be related to the dependence of the farmers on agents or intermediaries.\n  Often,\nif farmers visit the taluk office they lose their day's work, and they\nmay find that either the computer is down or that there is a power cut.

THERE\nARE SO MANY COMPLAINTS on BHOOMI Project which you all need to look\ninto the research Papers which will be provided to all of you.
___________________________________________

eProcurement Tendering in GOK.\n\n He is trying to favour C 1 INDIA. Please read what C 1 INDIA is facing.

Sub: C1 India affairs

Please find below\n one more affair of C1 India management affair, Karnataka has come up with a Tender for eProcurement on PPP model as of “,1] ); //–>
Bhoomi Project has led to a shrinkage in the number of possible land-holding types from 1500 to under 100. What does this mean and what are the impacts of this?

Bhoomi project represents an ideological shift from the social reform focus of land reforms to a purely technological phenomenon.

From a purely technical point of view, Bhoomi project has locked itself into Proprietary Microsoft Software.

The most vocal complaint of respondents has to do with the increased delays that have resulted after the launch of Bhoomi.  Before Bhoomi, we were told, obtaining a copy of an RTC, or a mutation, took 2-3 days.  These documents were made available at the village level via the VA and, as one small farmer put it, the work could be ‘fast and efficient’, at least in an emergency.

After Bhoomi, all categories of landowners said that any significant change like a mutation takes 3-4 months.  This delay may be related to the dependence of the farmers on agents or intermediaries.   Often, if farmers visit the taluk office they lose their day’s work, and they may find that either the computer is down or that there is a power cut.

THERE ARE SO MANY COMPLAINTS on BHOOMI Project which you all need to look into the research Papers which will be provided to all of you.
___________________________________________

eProcurement Tendering in GOK. He is trying to favour C 1 INDIA. Please read what C 1 INDIA is facing.

Sub: C1 India affairs

Please find below one more affair of C1 India management affair, Karnataka has come up with a Tender for eProcurement on PPP model as of , Please look in to the matter if Good Business Practices can be ensured:

 

\n\nCovansys has partnered C1 India Pvt. Ltd, a delhi based for offering eTendering solution to MPLUN, Madhya Pradesh, India.company which is in engaged in Rs. 38000 Crore eTendering scam in \nAndhra Pradesh , India . For more details log on to \n\nwww.mpez.net
C1 India has a IPR Theft case filed against them by a company called Antares System, Based out of \nBangalore India . The case is pending in Delhi High Court, India .
\nC1 India is engaged in another legal battle with a company called Nextenders, based out of \nMumbai for NIC Tender for eTendering solution. The same case in pending in Delhi\n High Court , India .
C1\nIndia is engaged in another legal battle for a tender for eTendering\nsoftware floated by MMTC, India . The case is pending in Delhi High\nCourt, India .
In\nMPLUN Tender, Covansys/C1 India JV is not Lowest Bidder. The lowest\nbidder is as per our market intelligence a MP based company
“,1] ); //–> Andhra Pradesh, Please look in to the matter if Good Business Practices can be ensured:

 

Covansys has partnered C1 India Pvt. Ltd, a delhi based for offering eTendering solution to MPLUN, Madhya Pradesh, India.company which is in engaged in Rs. 38000 Crore eTendering scam in Andhra Pradesh , India . For more details log on to www.mpez.net
C1 India has a IPR Theft case filed against them by a company called Antares System, Based out of Bangalore India . The case is pending in Delhi High Court, India .
C1 India is engaged in another legal battle with a company called Nextenders, based out of Mumbai for NIC Tender for eTendering solution. The same case in pending in Delhi High Court , India .
C1 India is engaged in another legal battle for a tender for eTendering software floated by MMTC, India . The case is pending in Delhi High Court, India .
In MPLUN Tender, Covansys/C1 India JV is not Lowest Bidder. The lowest bidder is as per our market intelligence a MP based company
___

GOK \n\nKarnataka\n Food & Civil Supplies Tendering is also on the wrong footting by using BHOOMI INFRASTRUCTURE.

Tender\nfor the computerization of food and civil supplies, favors microsoft.\nBut to keep everyone in dark the tender has been written in a manner\nthat it looks as if the entire software is free of cost. Amounts to\nDeception and Cheating.

GoK is asking the vendors to use the\nBhoomi infrastructure at the tehsil level (which is on Microsoft) for\napplication development and implementation.

Phase I of KFCS\ntender will just get the application build on Microsoft platform and\ndeployed this year. Next year when this is over, GoK will place order\non Microsoft for licenses purchase and hardware up gradation. The\nproject value at present is estimated at 8 crores which includes mere 1\ncrore of application development and deployment and remaining money for\nration card printing and distribution.

Where as in the phase II, its going to be Rs.\n 22 Crore order on Microsoft, the application developer and hardware vender. In near future it will start bleeding by paying huge sums of money as license fee to Microsoft. \n\n

Regarding\n.NET, it is a white elephant when a more powerful application software\ndevelopment environment in the form of SUN's Netbeans is available\nfree. This includes the Struts framework which is very very powerful\nand time tested. This is open and free too.

Whereas .NET is a\nnew platform. Except the name of microsoft, there is nothing special\nabout it. It is yet to gain full popularity among users whereas J2EE\narchitecture which is open and supported by SUN/IBM/Oracle etc.,\nthrough packages such as Netbeans, Tomcat etc., is more popular in the\nworld. In enterprise environment people prefer only J2EE. This includes\n“,1] ); //–>_________________________________

GOK Karnataka Food & Civil Supplies Tendering is also on the wrong footting by using BHOOMI INFRASTRUCTURE.

Tender for the computerization of food and civil supplies, favors microsoft. But to keep everyone in dark the tender has been written in a manner that it looks as if the entire software is free of cost. Amounts to Deception and Cheating.

GoK is asking the vendors to use the Bhoomi infrastructure at the tehsil level (which is on Microsoft) for application development and implementation.

Phase I of KFCS tender will just get the application build on Microsoft platform and deployed this year. Next year when this is over, GoK will place order on Microsoft for licenses purchase and hardware up gradation. The project value at present is estimated at 8 crores which includes mere 1 crore of application development and deployment and remaining money for ration card printing and distribution.

Where as in the phase II, its going to be Rs. 22 Crore order on Microsoft, the application developer and hardware vender. In near future it will start bleeding by paying huge sums of money as license fee to Microsoft.

Regarding .NET, it is a white elephant when a more powerful application software development environment in the form of SUN’s Netbeans is available free. This includes the Struts framework which is very very powerful and time tested. This is open and free too.

Whereas .NET is a new platform. Except the name of microsoft, there is nothing special about it. It is yet to gain full popularity among users whereas J2EE architecture which is open and supported by SUN/IBM/Oracle etc., through packages such as Netbeans, Tomcat etc., is more popular in the world. In enterprise environment people prefer only J2EE. This includes e-governance efforts.

Analysis on the civil\n supplies tender:
If\nit is a web based application, then there is no licencing involved at\nthe Taluk level even if it is microsoft product. But quoting this they\nare trying to add a processor which is not essential as in the web\nbased application the entire load would be taken by the web server and\nnot the local server. So, by adding a processor they are tying to pay\nadditional money to Microsoft.

At the State level if they are\nadding additional servers they need to pay full licence to microsoft.\nFor example .NET licence and mssql server multi processor licence. Also\nthey may have to pay for the additional processor use of IIS server\n(web server software)

Here  Oracle and Db2 would also charge\nlicencing fee for the database but not for the deployment software\nunless the government wants oracle application server or IBM's\nwebsphere. Currently the GOK may be using microsoft's internet\ninformation server (IIS) paying a huge licencing fee. The alternative\nis open source deployment software such as apache's tomcat or resin or\njboss. All these packages are available free. Apache tomcat is\nsupported by Apache foundation, sun micro systems, Novell and IBM.

The\npoint is that a fair deal is denied to OTHERS who are competitors to\nMicrosoft. This is improper. Let them give a fair chance to quote for\ntheir database and in the quote if they become L1 they should be\nallowed to deploy their database and or application deployment software\ntoo.
 

In the name of saving money they are trying to promote microsoft.

This has to be stopped by GOK.

GOK need to agree for an OS neutral database, application software and deployment software. \n


Singapore specifies in every tender "the applicaition shoftware should be compatible for cross platform deployment". Why not \n”,1] ); //–>Singapore e-governance efforts.

Analysis on the civil supplies tender:
If it is a web based application, then there is no licencing involved at the Taluk level even if it is microsoft product. But quoting this they are trying to add a processor which is not essential as in the web based application the entire load would be taken by the web server and not the local server. So, by adding a processor they are tying to pay additional money to Microsoft.

At the State level if they are adding additional servers they need to pay full licence to microsoft. For example .NET licence and mssql server multi processor licence. Also they may have to pay for the additional processor use of IIS server (web server software)

Here  Oracle and Db2 would also charge licencing fee for the database but not for the deployment software unless the government wants oracle application server or IBM’s websphere. Currently the GOK may be using microsoft’s internet information server (IIS) paying a huge licencing fee. The alternative is open source deployment software such as apache’s tomcat or resin or jboss. All these packages are available free. Apache tomcat is supported by Apache foundation, sun micro systems, Novell and IBM.

The point is that a fair deal is denied to OTHERS who are competitors to Microsoft. This is improper. Let them give a fair chance to quote for their database and in the quote if they become L1 they should be allowed to deploy their database and or application deployment software too.
 
In the name of saving money they are trying to promote microsoft.

This has to be stopped by GOK.

GOK need to agree for an OS neutral database, application software and deployment software.


Singapore specifies in every tender “the applicaition shoftware should be compatible for cross platform deployment”. Why not Karnataka and India?

If\nwe say cross platform, then .NET, Internet information server and ms\nsql server are out of the race. Because they are not cross platform.\nThey will work only under microsoft environment. Whereas Db2 and oracle\nwould work under microsoft and linux environment.

____________________________

Now Mr. Rajeev Chawla has called for TENDERS for:

\n\n1. Procurement of Servers for Bhoomi Project at various Taluks.
2. Procurement of Laser Printers for Bhoomi Project at various Taluks.
3. Procurement of Blade Servers for State Data Center Augmentation.

All\nof the TENDERING process and documents for the above favours only one\nVENDOR. Documents are prepared in such a way that ONE VENDOR can only\nbid on these TENDERS. IS THIS TRANSPARENCY in GOK?
_______________________________________

Mr. Rajeev Chawla has neglected the Kannada Software Development in \nKarnataka State.

With all these things happenning, GOK need to watch !!

If any questions on these, I would be willing to answer and write to all of you.\n

Thanks
Sincerely
signed by
V. M. Kumaraswamy, MBA

_____________________________________________________________

\neProcurement \nCase Background\n\n

“,1] ); //–>Karnataka and India?

If we say cross platform, then .NET, Internet information server and ms sql server are out of the race. Because they are not cross platform. They will work only under microsoft environment. Whereas Db2 and oracle would work under microsoft and linux environment.

____________________________

Now Mr. Rajeev Chawla has called for TENDERS for:

1. Procurement of Servers for Bhoomi Project at various Taluks.
2. Procurement of Laser Printers for Bhoomi Project at various Taluks.
3. Procurement of Blade Servers for State Data Center Augmentation.

All of the TENDERING process and documents for the above favours only one VENDOR. Documents are prepared in such a way that ONE VENDOR can only bid on these TENDERS. IS THIS TRANSPARENCY in GOK?
_______________________________________

Mr. Rajeev Chawla has neglected the Kannada Software Development in Karnataka State.

With all these things happenning, GOK need to watch !!

If any questions on these, I would be willing to answer and write to all of you.

Thanks
Sincerely
signed by
V. M. Kumaraswamy, MBA

______________________________

_______________________________

eProcurement Case Background/2006/06/27/eprocurement-case-background/\n

\n

 

\n

WHY Prime Minister's award for the fraudulent \ne-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they \nshould not reap such a benefit

\n\n\nUnbelievable Act of World Bank\n

\n

\n

 

\n

WHY Prime Minister's award for the fraudulent \ne-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they \nshould not reap such a benefit

\n

\n\n\nDoes Prime Minister of INDIA want to LEGITAMIZE \neProcurement scandle ? – IT Secretary RAO of AP writes: You are absolutely right \non this one. We gave totally misleading figures.“,1] ); //–> https://egovindia.wordpress.com/2006/06/27/eprocurement-case-background/

 

WHY Prime Minister’s award for the fraudulent e-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they should not reap such a benefit

Unbelievable Act of World Bank

https://egovindia.wordpress.com/2006/07/04/unbelievable-act-of-world-bank/

 

WHY Prime Minister’s award for the fraudulent e-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they should not reap such a benefit

Does Prime Minister of INDIA want to LEGITAMIZE eProcurement scandle ? – IT Secretary RAO of AP writes: You are absolutely right on this one. We gave totally misleading figures.

\n\n\nhttps://egovindia.wordpress.com/2007/01/16/does-prime-minister-of-india-want-to-legitamize-eprocurement-scandle-it-secretary-rao-of-ap-writes-you-are-absolutely-right-on-this-one-we-gave-totally-misleading-figures/\n\n\n

\n\n

\n

 

\n

WHY Prime Minister's award for the fraudulent \ne-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they \nshould not reap such a benefit

\n

\n

 

\n

\n

WHY Prime Minister's award for the fraudulent \ne-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they \nshould not reap such a benefit !!!

\n


\n

“,1] ); //–> https://egovindia.wordpress.com/2006/05/29/re-egovindia-eprocurement-case-background-govt-of-chattisgarah-and-govt-of-karnataka-need-to-watch-fraud-is-going-on-eprocurement-rfps-of-govt-of-karnataka-and-govt-of-chattisgarah-egovernance-secreta/

 

WHY Prime Minister’s award for the fraudulent e-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they should not reap such a benefit

World Bank need to INVESTIGATE before PATRONIZING / GLAMOURIZING Andhra Pradesh eProcurment SCAM.

http://nasscomundp.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/world-bank-need-to-investigate-before-patronizing-glamourizing-andhra-pradesh-eprocurment-scam/

 

WHY Prime Minister’s award for the fraudulent e-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they should not reap such a benefit !!!


eProcurement Scam in Andhra Pradesh – AP issues on \neProcurement // Unbelievable Act of World Bank // World Bank need to INVESTIGATE \nbefore PATRONIZING / GLAMOURIZING Andhra Pradesh \neProcurment SCAM.

\n

\n\n

 

\n

WHY Prime Minister's award for the fraudulent \ne-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they \nshould not reap such a benefit

\n

 

\n

\n

\n\n\n\nWorld Bank and UNDP please read letter from Tendercity \nto Sri. Narsing Rao , Secretary, ITC&C Dept. Andhra Pradesh State on \neProcurement scam worth Rs. 38,000 Crores in Andhra Pradesh State \nin INDIA.”,1] ); //–> eProcurement Scam in Andhra Pradesh – AP issues on eProcurement // Unbelievable Act of World Bank // World Bank need to INVESTIGATE before PATRONIZING / GLAMOURIZING Andhra Pradesh eProcurment SCAM.

https://egovindia.wordpress.com/2006/07/06/eprocurement-scam-in-andhra-pradesh-ap-issues-on-eprocurement-unbelievable-act-of-world-bank-world-bank-need-to-investigate-before-patronizing-glamourizing-andhra-pradesh-eprocurment-scam/

 

WHY Prime Minister’s award for the fraudulent e-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they should not reap such a benefit

 

World Bank and UNDP please read letter from Tendercity to Sri. Narsing Rao , Secretary, ITC&C Dept. Andhra Pradesh State on eProcurement scam worth Rs. 38,000 Crores in Andhra Pradesh State in INDIA.

\n

\n

 

\n

WHY Prime Minister's award for the fraudulent \ne-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they \nshould not reap such a benefit !!!

\n\n

\n

\n\n\n\nReply of Sri. Narsing Rao , Secretary, ITC&C Dept. \nAndhra Pradesh State to eProcurement- Representation of Sri. Ramesh Sinha, CEO, \nAppllitech Tendercity. com India Pvt. Ltd.- Apprehensions on security in \neProcurement platform – Reply- “,1] ); //–>

http://nasscomundp.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/world-bank-and-undp-please-read-letter-from-tendercity-to-sri-narsing-rao-secretary-itcc-dept-andhra-pradesh-state-on-eprocurement-scam-worth-rs-38000-crores-in-andhra-pradesh-state-in-india/

 

WHY Prime Minister’s award for the fraudulent e-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they should not reap such a benefit !!!

Reply of Sri. Narsing Rao , Secretary, ITC&C Dept. Andhra Pradesh State to eProcurement- Representation of Sri. Ramesh Sinha, CEO, Appllitech Tendercity. com India Pvt. Ltd.- Apprehensions on security in eProcurement platform – Reply- Reg. Mr. Rao writes: You are \nabsolutely right on this one. We gave totally misleading figures. The \ncorrect figures are: 9841 tenders worth Rs. 32,578 crores have been processed \nwith security loop holes.

\n

\n\n\n\nhttp://nasscomundp.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/reply-of-sri-narsing-rao-secretary-itcc-dept-andhra-pradesh-state-to-eprocurement-representation-of-sri-ramesh-sinha-ceo-appllitech-tendercity-com-india-pvt-ltd-apprehensions-on-security-in-eprocureme/\n

\n

WHY Prime Minister's award for the fraudulent \ne-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they \nshould not reap such a benefit !!!

\n\n
\n\n”,0] ); //–>Reg. Mr. Rao writes: You are absolutely right on this one. We gave totally misleading figures. The correct figures are: 9841 tenders worth Rs. 32,578 crores have been processed with security loop holes.

http://nasscomundp.wordpress.com/2006/07/05/reply-of-sri-narsing-rao-secretary-itcc-dept-andhra-pradesh-state-to-eprocurement-representation-of-sri-ramesh-sinha-ceo-appllitech-tendercity-com-india-pvt-ltd-apprehensions-on-security-in-eprocureme/

WHY Prime Minister’s award for the fraudulent e-procurement software of AP ?
After having committed a full fraud, they should not reap such a benefit !!!

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s